The winner of "The Movie Debates the World" was born. Huang Xiaoming choked blackwater and Ruby Lin spoiled.
1905 movie network news On October 13th, as a special activity of the 5th Silk Road International Film Festival, the first college students’ film debate competition "Film Debate World" decided the first champion team after 31 fierce tit-for-tat. The debating team of Xi ‘an Jiaotong University became the champion of the first film Debating the World, leaving the trophy in Xi ‘an.
Starting from the first group match on October 5th, 24 debate teams from colleges and universities all over the country started a heated debate on the issues of values and film phenomena derived from movies. In the end, eight teams advanced to the semi-finals, while Wuhan University and Xi ‘an Jiaotong University defeated Peking University and Beijing Foreign Studies University respectively to advance to the finals.
At the final, Huang Xiaoming, Ruby Lin and Zhang Yiwu appeared as judges. Lu Liang, leader of the National Film Bureau, Cao Yin, director of the Film Channel Program Center, Li Yuan, deputy mayor of Xi ‘an, Bing Lin, director of the Xi ‘an Wenguang New Bureau, and Wei Li, chairman of the 1905 Film Network, attended the event and presented awards to the winning teams.
Huang Xiaoming loves debating. He watched the 1993 College Debate Competition. Ruby Lin paid attention to the debating skills of both sides.
Huang Xiaoming and Ruby Lin were invited as judges in the final of "The World of Film Debate". At the scene, the two shared their views on youth and movies. Huang Xiaoming said that the magnificent movies brought together the bright moments of youth. Ruby Lin said that the joys and sorrows of youth have woven the colorful movies. Although it is a recitation performance, it already has the meaning of collision of views.
Before the final, Chen Min, the host and chairman of the debate, asked about their experience in watching the debate. Huang Xiaoming said that what impressed him most was a debate on "Nature is good and inherent vice", which attracted Chen Min’s exclamation. He also watched the same debate that year, and this debate was the final debate of the 1993 college debate competition. Ruby Lin also said that he was very concerned about the debate skills of both sides.
Zhang Yiwu, a cultural scholar who used to be the leader of the debate team, also said at the scene that debate is "gymnastics of thought, stretching the ligament of thought very long." The debate in the 1980s is also very different from that now. "Everyone is coming and going on an abstract and abstruse question. Demonstrate the ability to think critically. "
Xi ‘an Jiaotong University narrowly beat Wuhan University to win the best debater.
For a long time, Film Debates the World has helped the development of film by combining film with debate. Whether it is a science fiction movie or a realistic theme, this art form has always brought the audience discussion and thinking about society and life. The debate in the final can be said to be closely related to watching movies. The debaters on both sides discussed "Is it wrong to evaluate a movie with scores?" Such a debate.
On both sides of this debate, Wuhan University is a strong traditional debate team; Xi ‘an Jiaotong University, on the other hand, takes advantage of the landlord’s convenience to play at home. It must be said that it is exciting.
Zhengfang Wuhan University, which took the lead in the argument, thinks that it is wrong to evaluate a film with scores. In the argument link, the positive side insists on the score as the result of quantification, which directly affects the evaluation of the film. In their view, quantitative standards run counter to the artistic attributes of movies. The essence of a score is to get a higher score after homogenization, which is not applicable to an art like film.
On the other hand, Xi ‘an Jiaotong University believes that scores, as a product of the era of big data, have reference value. And the audience also has the right to use scores to show their attitude. Now the score proves the box office growth point of China film market, from traffic star to more sophisticated production.
After the question, the views of both sides remained firm. Zhengfang Wuda believes that when works of art are graded, the possibilities and directions have changed from multiple to single. The value of art lies in irreproducible originality and originality. On the other hand, Xi ‘an Jiaotong University believes that the score shows the evaluation of movies by different communities. Although the other side draws an analogy between employment and work, movies are different from people, and people, as the main body, cannot be evaluated by scores; But movies are appreciated and fed back, so scores are very important.
In the free debate session, the debaters of the opposing party, Xi ‘an Jiaotong University, used a large number of film scoring examples to illustrate that there is nothing wrong with scoring movies. For example, in the summer of 2015, the film "The Return of the Great Sage" was popular; Another example is the documentary "Twenty-two" released this year. In the eyes of the opposing debaters, scoring is not only an important factor for the public to enter the cinema, but also one of the reasons for the market to make adjustments.
However, the positive view is tightly locked in the score, which is detrimental to the artistry of the film. Wu Da debaters used artists such as Van Gogh as examples to prove that although works of art have commercial value and can be measured, their artistic value cannot be measured. Wu Da debaters even cited The Journey to the West and other books of A Dream of Red Mansions, and asked the opposing side how to grade these masterpieces.
In the end, the debate team of Xi ‘an Jiaotong University won by one vote and became the champion of the first film debate world. Wang Yuhang, the second debater of Xi ‘an Jiaotong University, became the best debater on the spot.
Huang Xiaoming criticized Blackwater for coming to the stage to hug the player Ruby Lin, saying, I just like it.
In the comment session, Huang Xiaoming, the judge, felt deeply and expressed his sadness about the falsification of the score. He said that the most painful thing was that the movie had just been released, and at midnight, no audience had finished watching the movie. "The star of the comment came out." Huang Xiaoming, who is dissatisfied with this phenomenon, bluntly said: "It is unfair, data fraud and network blackwater have become a means of collecting money." On the field, he called on someone to stand up boldly and say no to online fraud and online blackwater.
Talking about the performance on the field, Huang Xiaoming expressed his appreciation for the first debate and the second debate of the opposing side, and went to the stage to hug the two debaters. Ruby Lin, on the other hand, said that he appreciated the positive debate: "I am very impressed with the positive debate and very confident. Are very short and incisive. Stick to your own argument. " She also went to the stage and embraced the first debate and the second debate. When asked what he would do if he played on his own, Ruby Lin unexpectedly threw a charming expression: "If I were on the stage, I would say, I just like it."
Talking about the performance of his own team, Tan Fei, the film critic of the "Poison Uncle" tutor of the Wuhan University Debate Team, said that if the team is a movie, Wuhan University is richer than the other team. Song Fangjin, the tutor and screenwriter of Xi ‘an Jiaotong University, thinks that his team closely follows the theme of "Debating the World through Movies".
After the winner and runner-up, other awards of "Movie Debate the World" were also announced one by one. Judge Zhang Yiwu presented the award to Wang Yuhang, the best debater on the spot; Li Wei, the chairman of 1905 Film Network, presented awards to the Beijing Film Academy, which won the "strongest expressive force", and the Shenzhen University, which won the "strongest fighting power". Cao Yin, director of the program center of the film channel, presented awards to Cui Lei, the best debater in the whole process. Bing Lin, director of Xi ‘an Wenguang New Bureau, presented awards to the third runner-up Peking University and Beijing Foreign Studies University. Lu Liang, leader of the State Film Bureau, and Yuanze Li, vice mayor of Xi ‘an presented awards to the champion Xi ‘an Jiaotong University Debate Team and the runner-up Wuhan University Debate Team respectively.
The first college students’ film debate competition "Film Debate the World" was hosted by the Fifth Silk Road International Film Festival and the Film Channel Media Center. Discuss social issues in the name of light and shadow, and debate movies from a social perspective. As the main force of today’s film audience, college students speak out and discuss the social problems projected by the film, which makes the film debate the world particularly meaningful.
The complete list of winners of "The World of Film Debate":
Champion: Xi ‘an Jiaotong University
Runner-up: Wuhan University
Third place: Peking University, Beijing Foreign Studies University.
Best debater: Xi ‘an Jiaotong University Second Debate on Wang Yuhang
Best debater in the whole process: Cui Lei of Wuhan University.
The strongest expressive force: Beijing Film Academy
The strongest fighting capacity: Shenzhen University








